Skip to main content

Two Treatises of Government - The Preface

Reader, THOU hast here the Beginning and End of a Discourse concerning Government; what Fate has otherwise disposed of the Papers that should have filled up the middle, and were more than all the rest, 'tis not worth while to tell thee. These, which remain, I hope are sufficient to establish the Throne of our Great Restorer, Our present King William; to make good his Title, in the Consent of the People, which being the only one of all lawful Governments, he has more fully and clearly, than any Prince in Christendom: And to justify to the World the People of England, whose love of their Just and Natural Rights, with their Resolution to preserve them, saved the Nation when it was on the very brink of Slavery and Ruin. If these Papers have that evidence, I flatter my self is to be found in them, there will be no great miss of those which are lost, and my Reader may be satisfied without them. For I imagine, I shall have neither the time, nor inclination to repeat my Pains, and fill up the wanting part of my Answer, by tracing Sir Robert again, through all the Windings and Obscurities which are to be met with in the several Branches of his wonderful System. The King, and Body of the Nation, have since so thoroughly confuted his Hypothesis, that, I suppose, no Body hereafter will have either the Confidence to appear against our Common Safety, and be again an Advocate for Slavery; or the Weakness to be deceived with Contradictions dressed up in a Popular Stile, and well turned Periods. For if any one will be at the Pains himself, in those Parts which are here untouched, to strip Sir Robert’s Discourses of the Flourish of doubtful Expressions, and endeavour to reduce his Words to direct, positive, intelligible Propositions, and then compare them one with another, he will quickly be satisfied there was never so much glib Nonsense put together in well sounding English. If he think it not worth while to examine his Works all through, let him make an Experiment in that part where he Treats of Usurpation; and let him try, whether he can, with all his Skill, make Sir Robert intelligible, and consistent with himself, or common sense. I should not speak so plainly of a Gentleman, long since past answering, had not the Pulpit, of late Years, publickly owned his Doctrine, and made it the Currant Divinity of the Times. 'Tis necessary those Men, who taking on them to be Teachers, have so dangerously misled others, should be openly shewed of what Authority this their Patriarch is, whom they have so blindly followed, that so they may either retract what upon so ill Grounds they have vented, and cannot be maintained; or else justifie those Principles which they Preachd up for Gospel; though they had no better an Author than an English Courtier. For I should not have Writ against Sir Robert, or taken the pains to shew his mistakes, Inconsistencies, and want of (what he so much boasts of, and pretends wholly to build on) Scripture-proofs, were there not Men amongst us, who, by crying up his Books, and espousing his Doctrine, save me from the Reproach of Writing against a dead Adversary. They have been so zealous in this Point, that, if I have done him any wrong; I cannot hope they should spare me. I wish, where they have done the Truth and the Publick wrong, they would be as ready to Redress it and allow its just Weight to this Reflection, viz. That there cannot be done a greater Mischief to Prince and People, than the Propagating wrong Notions concerning Government; that so at last all times might not have reason to complain of the Drum Ecclesiastick. If any one, concerned really for Truth, undertake the Confutation of my Hypothesis, I promise him either to recant my mistake, upon fair Conviction; or to answer his Difficulties. But he must remember two Things;

First, That Cavilling here and there, at some Expression, or little incident of my Discourse, is not an answer to my Book.

Secondly, That I shall not take railing for Arguments, nor think either of these worth my notice: Though I shall always look on my self as bound to give satisfaction to any one who shall appear to be conscientiously scrupulous in the point, and shall shew any just Grounds for his scruples.

I have nothing more, but to advertise the Reader, that A stands for our Author. O for his Observations on Hobbs, Milton, &c. And that a bare Quotation of Pages always means Pages of his Patriarcha, Edit. 1680.


Popular posts from this blog

Two Treatises of Government

TWO TREATISES OF GOVERNMENT BY JOHN LOCKE In the Former, The False Principles, and Foundation OF Sir ROBERT FILMER, And his Followers, ARE Detected and Overthrown. The Latter Is an ESSAY CONCERNING THE True Original, Extent, and End OF Civil Government. The Preface BOOK I: The First Treatise of Government: The False Principles and Foundations of Sir Robert Filmer, and His Followers, are Detected and Overthrown Chapter 1: The Introduction Chapter 2: Of Paternal and Regal Power Chapter 3: Of Adam’s Title to Sovereignty, by Creation Chapter 4: Of Adam’s Title to Sovereignty, by Donation Chapter 5: Of Adam’s Title to Sovereignty, by the Subjection of Eve Chapter 6: Of Adam’s Title to Sovereignty, by Fatherhood Chapter 7: Of Fatherhood and Property, as Fountains of Sovereignty Chapter 8: Of the Conveyance of Adam’s Sovereign Monarchial Power Chapter 9: Of Monarchy, by Inheritance from Adam Chapter 10: Of the Heir to the Monarchial Power of Adam Chapter 11: Who Heir? BOOK II: The Second Trea

John Locke Biography

John Locke was born in 1632, during the reign of Charles I, and died in 1704, two years after the accession of Queen Anne. His life covered an unusually turbulent period of English history and his fortunes were affected by the stresses of the times in which he lived. He was born at Wrington in Somerset, the son of a West Country lawyer. The Civil War broke out when young John Locke was ten years old and his father joined the Parliamentary army. John Locke spent his childhood in Somerset and at the age of fourteen was sent to Westminster School where he stayed until his election to a junior studentship at Christ Church, Oxford, in 1652. From his Thoughts on Education, published in 1693, John Locke seems not to have been favorably impressed either by the curriculum at Westminster or with the savage discipline of the English public school of his time.

Of the Conduct of the Understanding

Of the Conduct of the Understanding by John Locke 1706 Section 01. Introduction. The last resort a man has recourse to in the conduct of himself is his understanding; for though we distinguish the faculties of the mind and give the supreme command to the will as to an agent, yet the truth is, the man which is the agent determines himself to this or that voluntary action upon some precedent knowledge or appearance of knowledge in the understanding. No man ever sets himself about anything but upon some view or other which serves him for a reason for what he does; and whatsoever faculties he employs, the understanding, with such light as it has, well or ill informed, constantly leads; and by that light, true or false, all his operative powers are directed. The will itself, how absolute and uncontrollable however it may be thought, never fails in its obedience to the dictates of the understanding. Temples have their sacred images, and we see what influence they have always had over a great